Unless you’ve been hiding under a rock, you know that evangelicals are embroiled in a lively debate about Adam and Eve. On one side are those who insist that Adam and Eve were the first and sole progenitors of the entire human race. The other side cautions against reading too much dogma into Genesis 2-3; it is a mythical tale that teaches us about God and humanity. Which are the white hats and the black hats? Depends on who you ask.

Whither Our Evangelical Future?

But the two sides do agree on one thing, namely how to understand the phrase “historical Adam”: this fellow is not merely the first man created by God long ago but he stands in for Augustine’s idea that all humanity sinned in Adam, and since we inherited his sin nature and guilt, the only cure is salvation in Christ.

The problem is that according to science today this traditional picture of a first couple is almost certainly impossible. Augustine’s picture of Adam and Eve seems to be a lost cause. This conclusion has brought on the usual hand-wringing and soul-searching among evangelicals. The problem is that according to science today this traditional picture of a first couple is almost certainly impossible.Many are suspicious that this debate is the latest round in the old warfare between science and faith: secular science vs. inerrant Bible, and the winner is . . . ?

Needless to say, none of this bodes well for the reputation of evangelical Christianity within the broader culture. None of this bodes well for evangelical scientists who accept the compelling scientific evidence but are also looking for thoughtful ways to integrate their faith and their callings. And surely none of this bodes well for gifted young people eager to enter the sciences yet worried they’ll have to abandon Christianity as the price of admission.

That’s the dilemma facing evangelicals, according to Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight. Their new book, Adam and the Genome (Brazos Press, 2017), is an important proposal for how to move beyond this impasse. While they disagree with evangelicals who champion a “historical Adam,” they don’t agree with merely fictional views of Adam either. It’s more complicated—the Bible has something distinctive to say about Adam, just not what people usually think.

Adam and the Genome: A Brief Summary

Baker Academic (2017)

Brazos Press (2017)

Venema, a biology professor at Trinity Western University in British Columbia and a frequent speaker and contributor for BioLogos, has a gift for clearly explaining the complexities of evolutionary biology from a Christian perspective, while McKnight is a widely recognized New Testament professor at Northern Seminary in Lombard, IL, a prolific author, and popular blogger at Jesus Creed. The book comes in eight chapters, the first four by Venema and the last four by McKnight—from start to finish their argument is well-written and stimulating, raising very provocative questions for evangelicals who seek an informed faith in dialogue with science.

In the first half, Venema introduces readers to the evidence for biological evolution as the best explanation for the diversity around us. He also argues from the human genome that all organisms, including bacteria, plants, and animals, derive from the same ancestor (i.e., common descent). Different lines of evidence confirm that our human population has never been less than about 10,000 individuals. That obviously rules out the idea that all human beings descended from an original pair. Many Christians disagree, of course, but Venema explains in detail why he thinks the best counter-arguments by the ID movement miss the mark.

McKnight’s half of the book accepts Venema’s conclusions, which then prompt him to revisit what the Bible actually says. His overriding concern is that a wrong picture of the “historical Adam” has held our minds captive. The picture that people have in their minds goes something like this (quoting from pp. 107-108)—

  1. Two actual (and sometimes only two) persons named Adam and Eve existed suddenly as a result of God’s creation;
  2. Those two persons have a biological relationship to all human beings that are alive today (biological Adam and Eve);
  3. Their DNA is our DNA (genetic Adam and Eve); and that often means
  4. Those two sinned, died, and brought death into the world (fallen Adam and Eve); and
  5. Those two passed on their sin natures (according to many) to all human beings (sin-nature Adam and Eve), which means
  6. Without their sinning and passing on that sin nature to all human beings, not all human beings would be in need of salvation;
  7. Therefore, if one denies the historical Adam, one denies the gospel of salvation.

Genesis 3 says nothing of the kind, McKnight insists. There’s no hint of a “sin nature,” or the transmission of sin, or most of the other ideas people associate with the “historical Adam.” In fact, when we actually re-read the biblical passages with fresh eyes, when we read Scripture in its historical context, we find Adam to be primarily a literary figure. He’s a character in the Genesis story who has been interpreted in multiple ways by generations of Jewish readers. In Romans 5, Paul is tapping into that long tradition of interpretation. He likely assumed the historicity of Adam, but we shouldn’t think that Paul invested “historical” with the kind of significance we do today. McKnight’s argument, in other words, is that Scripture doesn’t give us a “historical Adam” at all, but rather a “literary Adam.” The pay-off is that Christians don’t need to be fearful of what evolutionary science is telling us.

Here ends the teaser. There’s much more to this book—take up and read!

Setting the Table: Symposium Participants

At the Creation Project, we think its arguments are important enough to merit the present book symposium. We’ve invited five scholars from different disciplines to offer their personal reflections on the book. Venema and McKnight will then offer a response; and finally, the Director of the Henry Center—Thomas McCall—will wrap up the symposium.

A brief introduction to the participants—

Darrell Bock is Executive Director of Cultural Engagement and Senior Research Professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary. He is the author of multiple books, including his most recent, Jesus According to Scripture: Restoring the Portrait from the Gospels, 2d ed. (Baker Academic, 2017).
Jitse M. van der Meer is Professor of Biology and History & Philosophy of Science at Redeemer University College in Canada. He is one of the leaders in science and theology and is widely published in the field. He most recently edited the four-volume series, Nature and Scripture in the Abrahamic Religions (Brill, 2008).
Elizabeth “Lisa” Sung is the Chester and Margaret Paluch Professor of Theology at the University of St. Mary of the Lake/Mundelein Seminary. She was formerly Associate Professor of Biblical and Systematic Theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. Her current research focuses on theological anthropology and the theology of race.
S. Joshua Swamidass is an Assistant Professor of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine at Washington University (St. Louis). His research group designs computational methods to solve problems in medicine and drug discovery. He is also a frequent speaker on faith and science and hosts a blog called Peaceful Science.
Fazale “Fuz” Rana is the Vice President of Research & Apologetics at Reasons to Believe (working closely with Hugh Ross). He is published in peer-reviewed scientific journals; his recent publications include Dinosaur Blood and the Age of the Earth, (RTB Press, 2016) and Who Was Adam? A Creation Model Approach to the Origin of Humanity2nd ed. (RTB Press, 2015).
Thomas H. McCall is Professor of Biblical and Systematic Theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School and Director of the Carl F. H. Henry Center for Theological Understanding. His recent publications include An Invitation to Christian Analytic Theology (IVP, 2015) and Jacob Arminius: Theologian of Grace (OUP, 2012) co-authored with Keith Stanglin.


The table is now set. The meal is about to be served. We hope you will join us in a fascinating dialogue around the book, Adam and the Genome by Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight.

Bon Appétit!



Introduction to the Symposium
Hans Madueme | Covenant College
What God has Joined Together: A Look at the Biblical Discussion
Darrell Bock | Dallas Theological Seminary
On Insulin, Orangoutangs, and Adam
Jitse M. van de Meer | Redeemer University College
  Wanted: A Plausible, Post-Genomic Biblical Adam and Eve
Elizabeth “Lisa” Sung | Mundelein Seminary
  A Genealogical Adam and Eve in Evolution
S. Joshua Swamidass | Washington University (St. Louis)
  If Christ Be Not Raised: Reflections on Methodological Naturalism
Fazale “Fuz” Rana | Reasons to Believe
Scot McKnightDennis Venema
Response to the Symposium
Science, Theology, & Charitable Discussion: A Symposium Recap
Thomas H. McCall | Trinity Evangelical Divinity School